#Украина #regulatory guillotine 13 января 2017 группа народных депутатов Верховной Рады зарегистрировала законопроект №3766 «Об изменении системы регулирования экономики». Парламентарии обосновывают его принятие невозможностью эффективного реформирования разрешительной системы и необходимостью отмены регуляторных документов, которые не несут в себе функции защиты потребителей товаров и услуг, а только увеличивают себестоимость производства, что значительно усложняет условия ведения бизнеса, а их стоимость иногда является большей частью цены конечного продукта. С этой целью, по мнению депутатов, необходимо, чтобы абсолютно все законодательные акты, регулирующие вопросы получения субъектами предпринимательской деятельности разрешительных документов и/или которыми установлены иные нормы, регулирующие хозяйственную деятельность, спустя 365 дней с момента принятия закона утратили силу. http://sud.ua/newspaper/2016/02/08/86597-regylyatornaya-gilotina-dlya-biznesa
sud.ua
«Регуляторная гильотина» для бизнеса | Судебно юридическая газета
Речь идет не о ликвидации системы регулирования, а об установлении для правительства четкого «дедлайна» перезагрузки регуляторной системы...
#Regulatory #barriers to international scientific #innovation: approving new biotechnology in North America http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/11926422.2016.1190771
Taylor & Francis
Regulatory barriers to international scientific innovation: approving new biotechnology in North America
(2017). Regulatory barriers to international scientific innovation: approving new biotechnology in North America. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal: Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 134-145. doi: 10.1080/11926422.2016.1190771
#S&P #regulatory Агенство Standard & Poor's в своем рейтинговом обзоре России коснулось и регуляторики, связав слабый рост втч с неэффективностью госуправления и игнорированием предложений реформ. Впрочем, автоматически вспоминают "Doing Business", хотя в динамике RQ WGI автор обзора нашел бы больше понимания процессам, которые он выше описал: "At the same time, negative demographic trends and low productivity continue to weigh on Russia's long-term growth potential. Structural impediments to productivity-driven growth include the state's dominant and increasing role in the economy, the challenging business and regulatory environment, and relatively low levels of competition and innovation. We expect these factors will continue to constrain Russia's pace of per capita growth, which is currently only one-half of the average pace of growth for the sample of over 30 rated sovereigns with similar income levels (measured by $ GDP per capita). (...) The recent re-election of President Putin has enabled the government to make a number of ambitious policy proposals focused on boosting infrastructure and human capital investment, productivity, and growth. Framed under the new presidential decree, these proposals involve a number of fiscal and structural measures and come on top of recent progress in business regulatory reforms, which is reflected, for example, by Russia's advances in the World Bank's "Doing Business" ranking. The new policy agenda includes challenging and unpopular reforms--such as raising the retirement age, reducing the share of the informal economy, tackling vested interests, and levelling the playing field for SOEs— all of which could be instrumental in stimulating higher growth. At the same time, we remain guarded about the prospects of a substantial strengthening of Russia's investment climate, including improvements in the judicial system and law enforcement, given our view of a limited effectiveness of past reform initiatives. Also, while authorities have regularly discussed privatization and demonopolization in the past, implemented policies and measures point in the opposite direction, leading us not to expect any notable reduction in the government's role in the economy. bit.ly/2LANTpJ
#ITU #МСЭ GSR-18 BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES ON NEW #REGULATORY FRONTIERS TO ACHIEVE #DIGITAL #TRANSFORMATION https://www.itu.int/net4/ITU-D/CDS/GSR/2018/documents/Guidelines/GSR-18_BPG_Final-E.PDF
III. Policy and regulatory approaches for continued innovation
and progress
We believe that clear consideration is needed to ensure that the
policy and regulatory approaches adopted are not a barrier to future
innovation and progress while protecting consumers and extending
connectivity to those who remain unconnected. To this end, we the
regulators participating in the 2018 Global Symposium for Regulators,
believe that we need to:
• consider putting in place innovative, out-of-the-box measures such
as:
» regulatory sandboxes for enterprises wishing to test an emerging
technology or innovative service without being bound by all the
regulations that would normally apply;
» “start-up and experiment” interfaces to support start-ups,
enterprises and communities in their experimental initiatives;
» 5G pilot projects to obtain initial feedback and facilitate reflection
and design of future spectrum allocations while stimulating the
take-up of services, building specific use cases and assessing
future challenges related to emerging technologies under real-life
conditions;promote further public participation and consultation in the
regulatory process through regulation by data, that is based on
information and observations of digital stakeholders and users,
providing citizens and stakeholders with the most detailed and
transparent information, and allowing consultation and participation
in the regulatory decision-making process to complement the
regulator’s traditional tools;
• establish effective mechanisms for cooperation across the sectors
to promote the development of cross-cutting services such as
e-commerce, e-banking, and e-health, including with consumer
protection authorities, service providers and other relevant bodies at
the national, regional and international levels;
• consider, as appropriate and within our mandate, the necessary
frameworks to ensure privacy and security of government, business
and consumer data so that stakeholders are adequately informed
about potential security and privacy challenges they may face with
online services, and have access to timely and accurate information
regarding the services and applications they use (including reliability,
speed, quality of service and data traffic management).
III. Policy and regulatory approaches for continued innovation
and progress
We believe that clear consideration is needed to ensure that the
policy and regulatory approaches adopted are not a barrier to future
innovation and progress while protecting consumers and extending
connectivity to those who remain unconnected. To this end, we the
regulators participating in the 2018 Global Symposium for Regulators,
believe that we need to:
• consider putting in place innovative, out-of-the-box measures such
as:
» regulatory sandboxes for enterprises wishing to test an emerging
technology or innovative service without being bound by all the
regulations that would normally apply;
» “start-up and experiment” interfaces to support start-ups,
enterprises and communities in their experimental initiatives;
» 5G pilot projects to obtain initial feedback and facilitate reflection
and design of future spectrum allocations while stimulating the
take-up of services, building specific use cases and assessing
future challenges related to emerging technologies under real-life
conditions;promote further public participation and consultation in the
regulatory process through regulation by data, that is based on
information and observations of digital stakeholders and users,
providing citizens and stakeholders with the most detailed and
transparent information, and allowing consultation and participation
in the regulatory decision-making process to complement the
regulator’s traditional tools;
• establish effective mechanisms for cooperation across the sectors
to promote the development of cross-cutting services such as
e-commerce, e-banking, and e-health, including with consumer
protection authorities, service providers and other relevant bodies at
the national, regional and international levels;
• consider, as appropriate and within our mandate, the necessary
frameworks to ensure privacy and security of government, business
and consumer data so that stakeholders are adequately informed
about potential security and privacy challenges they may face with
online services, and have access to timely and accurate information
regarding the services and applications they use (including reliability,
speed, quality of service and data traffic management).
#AI #ИИ #ALGORITHMS AND #HUMAN #RIGHTS Study on the human rights dimensions of automated data processing techniques and possible #regulatory implications https://rm.coe.int/algorithms-and-human-rights-en-rev/16807956b5
#US #regulatory The following lesson covers how the U.S. government uses its regulatory policy to oversee business activities. A short quiz will follow the lesson to check your understanding. https://study.com/academy/lesson/regulatory-policy-definition-processes-examples.html
#Regulatory #Authorities for #Electronic #Media and Media #Literacy - Comparative analysis of the best European practices
https://www.coe.int/en/web/freedom-expression/co-operation-activities/-/asset_publisher/lfknItIoxO4x/content/presentation-of-the-study-regulatory-authorities-for-electronic-media-and-media-literacy-comparative-analysis-of-the-best-european-practices-?inheritRedirect=false&redirect=https://www.coe.int/en/web/freedom-expression/co-operation-activities%3Fp_p_id%3D101_INSTANCE_lfknItIoxO4x%26p_p_lifecycle%3D0%26p_p_state%3Dnormal%26p_p_mode%3Dview%26p_p_col_id%3Dcolumn-1%26p_p_col_count%3D3
https://www.coe.int/en/web/freedom-expression/co-operation-activities/-/asset_publisher/lfknItIoxO4x/content/presentation-of-the-study-regulatory-authorities-for-electronic-media-and-media-literacy-comparative-analysis-of-the-best-european-practices-?inheritRedirect=false&redirect=https://www.coe.int/en/web/freedom-expression/co-operation-activities%3Fp_p_id%3D101_INSTANCE_lfknItIoxO4x%26p_p_lifecycle%3D0%26p_p_state%3Dnormal%26p_p_mode%3Dview%26p_p_col_id%3Dcolumn-1%26p_p_col_count%3D3
Freedom of Expression
Presentation of the Study “Regulatory Authorities for Electronic Media and Media Literacy - Comparative analysis of the best European…
Belgrade 20 December 2018
#Песочницы #Regulatory #sandboxes #эксперимент Наш эксперт дал #РБК @rbc_news комментарий на проект федерального закона "Об экспериментальных правовых режимах в сфере цифровых инноваций в Российской Федерации", который подготовило Минэкономразвития (@minecrussia)
Необходимость законодательного регулирования экспериментальных правовых режимов назрела давно, сказал РБК ведущий научный сотрудник Центра технологий госуправления #РАНХиГС Алексей Ефремов. Но «понятийный аппарат законопроекта» не согласован с действующим законодательством и вводит много неопределенных категорий, считает эксперт.
Достаточно спорна, по его словам, и предлагаемая схема управления экспериментальными правовыми режимами, предусматривающая разделение функций уполномоченного и регулирующего органов, а также создание публично-правовой компании.
https://www.rbc.ru/economics/11/01/2019/5c371c399a794765e779a32b?from=newsfeed
Необходимость законодательного регулирования экспериментальных правовых режимов назрела давно, сказал РБК ведущий научный сотрудник Центра технологий госуправления #РАНХиГС Алексей Ефремов. Но «понятийный аппарат законопроекта» не согласован с действующим законодательством и вводит много неопределенных категорий, считает эксперт.
Достаточно спорна, по его словам, и предлагаемая схема управления экспериментальными правовыми режимами, предусматривающая разделение функций уполномоченного и регулирующего органов, а также создание публично-правовой компании.
https://www.rbc.ru/economics/11/01/2019/5c371c399a794765e779a32b?from=newsfeed
#agencies #regulatory Коллеги из Regulation & Governance проделали грандиозную работу по сбору информации об институциональном статусе регуляторных агентств, а также написали вводную статью. "The dataset contains 799 agencies covering 115 countries and 17 policy sectors and refers to their formal status in 2010. We have made publicly available the data for the academic community:
https://www.globalreg.info/institutional-features-of-regulatory-agencies.html (Россия тоже есть)
https://www.globalreg.info/institutional-features-of-regulatory-agencies.html (Россия тоже есть)
GLOBALREG
Institutional features of Regulatory Agencies
On March 2018, the journal Regulation & Governance published the article “Agency proliferation and the globalization of the regulatory state: Introducing a data set on the institutional features...
#regulatory Cary Coglianese, рук. программы Penn regulation пишет в своей рецензии на новую книгу Кристи Форд Innovation and the State: Finance, Regulation, and Justice, что инновации несут риск для собственно регулирования. Правда, речь идет о (скорее) "статичном" характере регулирования на Западе, для нас этот аргумент вряд применим: нормативка меняется часто, бизнес и граждане привыкли жить в ситуации "регуляторного хаоса"🙈 Только "динамичность", задают, увы, не инновации, а коллективный "бешеный принтер". https://www.theregreview.org/2019/02/25/coglianese-innovation-regulatory-vigilance/
The Regulatory Review
Regulatory Vigilance in a Changing World | The Regulatory Review
In a new book, Cristie Ford advocates that regulators pay closer attention to private-sector innovation.
#анонс #evaluation #regulatory 2019 Annual Workshop Osservatorio AIR: Alternative Modes of Evaluating EU Impact Assessments and Regulation. A comprehensive analysis of the quality of IA and regulation should aim to capture the relationship between policy makers on the one hand, and business, scientific communities, independent regulatory agencies, and private consultancies on the one hand. Especially in times of an externalization and pluralization of policy advisory landscapes, it is also relevant to ask which knowledge feeds into IAs and regulations and of which quality it is. Another key dimension of empirical research is the institutional environment that affects the production of knowledge. https://www.osservatorioair.it/awoa2019-alternative-modes-of-evaluating-eu-impact-assessments-and-regulation/
Osservatorio AIR
#AWOA2019: Alternative Modes of Evaluating EU Impact Assessments and Regulation
2019 Annual Workshop Osservatorio AIR: Alternative Modes of Evaluating EU Impact Assessments and Regulation The workshop aims to advance available techniques and approaches for evaluating Impact As…