Rule request (I am not sure whether this is a bug or a rule request, sorry if I picked the wrong one.) Thesis WPS432 currently is applied to magic numbers within literal types. foobar: Literal[9001...

This code should raise a violation: >>> x = f'{ 1 # comment ... }' Because comments make f string implicilty multiline. And comments must not be present in strings. This is not right.

What's wrong def foobar() -> Any: def inner_func(x: Any) -> Any: return x class Foobar: def __init__(self: Self): self.x = 1 def get_x(self: Self) -> int: return self.x return inner_fu...

Rule request Allow finally block to have simple content only. It can contain few lines of code, but it shouldn't contain untrivial logic, which can not be understand very quickly at code readin...

Right now we can have two problems: class Some(object): for x in [1, 2]: print(x) print(Some.x) # oups, will show you `2` and with modules: # some.py for x in [1, 2]: print(x) # __main__ import som...

Currently we use MAX_CONDITIONS: Final = 4 as a constant in constants.py. There's no way to configure MAX_CONDITIONS. However, there might be projects where 5 or even 8 might be reasonable. So,...

We don't allow list and set to be used as iterable parts of for, because we only allow tuples there. We need to allow SetComp in for iterable: 118:22 WPS335 Found incorrect `for` loop iter type...

Code like this def func(**kwargs): if 'a' in kwargs: assert 'a_kwargs' not in kwargs else: kwargs['a'] = other( **kwargs.pop('a_kwargs', {}), ) raises WPS529 I don&#...

What's wrong I encountered this error in one of my functions for a game on Pygame, and after reviewing the WPS documentation, I believe it is a false positive. Please review the function yourse...