Путєн, тікай з міста!

Неразумные португальцы построили крупнейшую в Европе плавучую солнечную электростанцию и думают, что не будут покупать у рахи газ еще 40 лет. Или не будут? Газмяс, шо там с ебалом?

Sho, blyat?)

This has been going on since the poisoning of Yushchenko in 2004 and began in fact immediately after Putin came to power, because the results of influence operations last on average at least 4-5 years.

Agents of influence in the EU and the US did not appear out of nowhere - they had enough time to acquire the necessary connections, create agent networks, gain an impeccable reputation among the authorities in Europe and America, and shape the worldviews of those who are now either already in positions of power, will soon be or simply have a chance to come to power

Russia has actually had a 25-year head start. And this is a problem not only for the intelligence services of Western countries, but primarily for the worldview and understanding of Russians, who, for some unknown reason, have ceased to be considered imperialists and have instead been equated with those who value democracy, freedom of speech, etc. For some reason, the Western world stubbornly wanted the crocodile to be a fluffy kitten, and fuck if it was green and toothy, it's a toothy breed, it's a cat and it doesn't fuck.

In the end, the crocodile turned out to be no cat at all, and grew up with bigger appetites:

First, it wanted to devour Ukraine, but choked on it in 2004.

Then it swallowed Georgia partially, and the world stubbornly believed that that green fuck was still a kitten - it just had such an appetite, what the fuck have you done to the poor animal?

Then came the Crimea, the partial invasion of Ukraine in 2014 (the kitten has a young body, it's growing, huh?)

Then the full-scale invasion in 2022 (the cat shit on the table, there was no one else in the house, but the owner of the furry still doubts that he did it - maybe it was a neighbour's cat?)

It was only at the end of 2023-2024 that most people realised that it was a crocodile, not a green breed of cat from Russia.

At least, I want to believe that it did. Because if it doesn't, then everything is really bad and no one and nothing will save this planet

And I'm not talking about the anti-vaccination movements in all democratic countries, which aimed not only to weaken trust in state institutions, but also to recruit agents for the Russian special services, who hated any government in the EU and in the world not only for money, but also because they were really sincere, because of insults from the authorities, etc.

How many investigations have been conducted into anti-vaccination movements in the EU? Who has been imprisoned because of their ties to Moscow, the Russian special services, and provoking people to take to the streets during the pandemic? The correct answer is zero.

Therefore, I see nothing surprising that the dominance of the Russian agent network increased exponentially during the Covid - anti-vaccinationists were ideal candidates for recruitment, just like they are described in the books of the special services, and it was a sin not to take advantage of this

And the question is not to show or prove that the Russian special services, despite a huge number of failures, are still a real force in Europe and the United States. The point of the article is a little different - to wake up the Western intelligence services from their sleep, which have fucked up (slept through) 25 years of active operations against them, similar to those that were once implemented during the Cold War
👇👇👇

And the sooner this happens, the sooner everything can be changed and cured.

Epilogue. Trump, in my opinion, is not a cotton candy or pro-Russian. Neither is Elon.

We need to look a little further, deeper, to understand who is pro-Kremlin in their environment - these are the people who shaped their worldview, and they themselves remained in the shadows. Finding them = finding a connection with the Russian special services

And it doesn't have to be someone close to you. It's enough that for several years in a row, someone has been taking a smoke break and telling a joke about stupid Americans.

It's enough for a housekeeper, a manicurist, a driver, a neighbour who has lived there for a long time and invites you to evening gatherings every week, a fitness trainer, an acquaintance who also runs in the morning, to tell and relay Russian narratives. In a few years, this environment will turn a person into a pro-Kremlin activist who will be 150% sure that he came to everything on his own, and not someone who has been putting all this Moscow shit in his head for years

This technology has always worked, is working and will work even in 100 years.

But in order to see that this is really happening, you need to recognise that that long green thing with teeth is a crocodile, not a rare breed of green cat.

Hello, US and EU intelligence services. You have too many cats that don't look like fucking cats. If you don't see it, go to an eye doctor or something.

Or ask the Ukrainians - they have been living next to these monsters for centuries, so they can see them a kilometre away.

The end

P.s. - if you want to help Ukraine's counter-propaganda, please contact 4441111068433840

PayPal- [email protected]

Patreon

https://www.patreon.com/fashdonetsk

Btc -

bc1qdtrkvnqhur6zvftku73stq88y97ut4rg730kdq

Трамп, Ілона та інші. На злобу дня

Преамбула. Незважаючи на всі слова, які вже озвучені і Трампом, і деякими людьми з його адміністрації, моя особиста думка - ніякої зради поки шо немає. Бо є слова і є дії: поки іде озброєння та гроші, я не маю бажання гвалтувати свою власну нервову систему (хай пиздять шо завгодно, аби було чим пиздити йобнутих). А там побачимо

Але стаття не про Трампа, не про Ілону, яка б вже сьогодні поїхала в москву, якби це не мало наслідків, а трохи про інше - про те, що пропаганда всюди діє однаково.

Про те, що не обовʼязково захоплювати країну та ставити на її чолі умовного орбана чи Януковича, якого потім, за допомогою компромату, можна використовувати у власних інтересах скільки завгодно. Мова про те, що технології впливу змінились - премʼєр чи президент країни не обовʼязково має бути проросійським:

достатньо лише шоб його оточення було таким, воно і сформує його світогляд.

Ця технологія працює. Можна називати її хоч операцією активного впливу, хоч глибокою розробкою обʼєкта, хоч психологічною обробкою (brainwashing), але результат завжди один - той, проти кого вищезгадані заходи проводяться, ніколи не дізнається шо саме його друг чи радник впровадив, змінив його світогляд.

А якщо і дізнається, то буде всё заперечувати - він ж не такий, як ті, на кого це подіяло, а людина, що вміє мислити самостійно, він би помітив шо йому намагаються в голову шось занести і т д

Але по факту маємо те шо маємо. Європа знову проспала і тепер, окрім орбана та фіцо + вучіча в ЄС на одного проросійського президента більше - в Хорватії переміг ставленик москви. Америка ж натомість проспала операцію впливу щодо Трампа та його оточення.

З поганого - чарівної таблетки, кнопки, натиснувши яку можна все швидко змінити, не існує - подібні явища лікуються ще довше, ніж впроваджуються ворогами.

Проте це зовсім не значить шо нічого змінити не можна. Можна. Якшо визнати власні помилки і зробити з них правильні висновки + зробити все, шоб в майбутньому подібного більше не сталося. Можна почати хоча б розглянути можливість подивитися під іншим кутом на тих, хто пропонує не перший рік нормалізувати стосунки з москвою без зміни політичного курсу рф, а сам живе там, де одні геї навкруги і матрьошок нема, в США чи ЄС

Але… але це втручання у внутрішні справи незалежних країн, в яких є власні служби безпеки, контррозвідка та інші спецслужби, що як раз цим і мають займатися. Хто я такий шоб вчити їх, як їм виконувати їх роботу?

Нічого не змінилося з часів холодної війни. Просто хтось погано вивчив уроки. Технології впливу фактично ті самі шо і в 60-70-х роках, змінився лише час розповсюдження інформації,,можливість доступу до інформації + зʼявилися соцмережі. Все інше залишилось без змін - є хрестоматійні прийоми, які працюють і працюватимуть через 100 років.

Тому, як тільки чуєте шось пацифістське, коли іде мова про москву, чи людина позиціонує себе як журналіст чи активіст з «альтернативною» думкою, то сумніви мають бути лише в тому, де недогледіли, прогледіли звʼязок зі спецслужбами рф. Такі реалії на сьогодні.

Хто їх не хоче сприймати, отримає у вищих ешелонах влади своєї країни прокремлівського персонажа, що буде говорити або як путін, або як російське телебачення, використовуючи ті самі наративи та фейкові дані щодо ситуації в світі

І це все сталося не вчора. Не в 2022 році і навіть не в 2014-му. Це триває з моменту отруєння Ющенка в 2004 році і почалося по факту одразу після приходи до влади путіна, бо результати операцій впливу тривають в середньому мінімум 4-5 років.

Агенти впливу в ЄС та США не взялися нізвідки - в них було достатньо часу шоб і обзавестися потрібними звʼязками, і створити агентурні мережі, і здобути для себе бездоганну репутацію серед владних структур Європи та Америки, і сформувати світогляди тих, хто зараз або вже на керуючих посадах, або скоро будуть чи просто мають шанси прийти до влади
👇👇👇

В рф 25 років фори фактично.

І це проблема не лише спецслужб західних держав, а насамперед світогляду та розуміння росіян, яких, за незрозумілих обставин, чомусь перестали вважати імперцями, і натомість прирівняли до тих, хто цінують демократію, свободу слова і т д. Західний світ чомусь вперто хотів шоб крокодил був пухнастим кошеням, і похуй шо воно зелене і зубате шопіздєц - це порода така зубата, це котик і не їбе.

У підсумку крокодил виявився ні разу не котом, виріс і його апетити збільшилися:

спочатку він захотів зжерти Україну, але поперхнувся, в 2004 році

Потім він проковтнув Грузію частково, а світ вперто вважав шо та зелена хуйня все одно кошеня - в нього апетит просто такий, шо ви доїблися до бідної тваринки??

Потім стався Крим, часткове вторгнення в Україну в 2014 році (у котика молодий організм, росте, хулі)

Потім повномасштабне в 2022 році (кіт насрав на стіл, в хаті нікого не було більше, але власник пухнастого досі сумнівається що це він все зробив - може то сусідський кіт?)

І лише десь в кінці 2023-2024 року до більшості дійшло шо то був таки крокодил, а не зелена порода котів з рф.

Принаймі, хочеться вірити шо дійшло. Бо якшо не дійшло, то тоді все реально погано і цю планету вже ніхто і ніщо врятує

І це я мовчу про антивакцинаторські рухи по всім демократичним країнам, метою яких було не лише послабити довіру до державних інституцій, а й набір агентури для спецслужб рф, які ненавиділи будь-яку владу в ЄС та в світі не лише за гроші - вони реально щиро це робили, через образи зі сторони влади і т д

Скільки розслідувань відбулося щодо антивакцинаторських рухів в ЄС? Кого конкретно кинули до вʼязниці через звʼязки з москвою, зі спецслужбами рф, та провокуванням людей виходити на вулиці під час пандемії? Правильна відповідь - нуль .

Тому не бачу нічого дивного шо засилля російської агентурної мережі збільшилися в геометричній прогресії саме під час ковіду - антивакцинатори являли собою ідеальних претендентів для вербування, тупо таких, про яких пишуть в книжках спецслужб, і цим було гріх не скористатися

І питання не в тому, шоб показати чи довести те, що спецслужби рф, незважаючи на величезну кількість промахів, все одно є реальною силою в Європі та США. Сенс статті трохи в іншому - в пробудженні зі сну спецслужб Заходу, які просрали (проспали) 25 років ведення проти них активних дій, аналогічних, що були колись втілені під час холодної війни

І чим раніше це станеться, тим скоріше все можна змінити та вилікувати.

Епілог. Трамп, на мою думку, не ватний чи проросійський. Ілона також

Треба дивитися трохи далі, глибше - розуміти, хто прокацапський в їх оточенні - саме ці люди сформували їх світогляд, а самі залишились в тіні. Знайти їх = знайти звʼязок зі спецслужбами рф

І це не обовʼязково має бути хтось надто близький. Достатньо шоб декілька років підряд на умовний перекур ходив ніхто, який буде розказувати анекдот поо тупих американців.

Достатньо шоб хатня робітниця, манікюрщиця, водій, сусід, який живе давно та кожен тиждень запрошує на вечірні посиденьки, тренер по фітнесу, знайомий шо бігає також зранку, розказували-ретранслювали російські наративи. Через декілька років це оточення зробить з людини прокацапського активіста, який буде на 150% впевнений шо він сам до всього прийшов, а не хтось йому це все московське гівно вкладав в голову роками

Ця технологія завжди працювала, працює і працюватиме навіть через 100 років.

Але шоб побачити те, що це реально відбувається, потрібно визнати шо та довжелезна зелена хуйня з зубами - крокодил, а не рідкісна порода зелених котів.

Привіт спецслужбам США та ЄС. У вас цей… забагато котиків, які ну ніхуя на котиків не схожі. Якщо не бачите - сходіть до окуліста чи шо

Або зверніться до українців - вони поряд з цими потворами не одне століття поряд живуть, тому бачать їх за кілометр.

Кінець

P.s - хочеш допомогти контрпропаганді України? - 4441111068433840

PayPal- [email protected]

Патреон -

https://www.patreon.com/fashdonetsk

ВТС -

bc1qdtrkvnqhur6zvftku73stq88y97ut4rg730kdq

Драсьте

Біндєри, чьто с ліцамі???

Пишуть що це Маріуполь.

Без коментарів

Я перепрошую, а це взагалі реально?

Страшно, суки?

🫡 Коли треба швидко, якісно й без помилок — працює 17 центр спецпризначення.

Вони вчергове провели безкоштовну акцію та вручили квитки на захоплюючий концерт під назвою «пекло»! Приємного перегляду, рускій іван!

Хочеш з нами?
Вривайся в команду, і твій час, а особливо ночі, наповняться новими барвами військового кохання🔥

📞Дізнавайся більше за номером:
+38 (097) 013 17 17

Підписуйтесь на нас у соцмережах👇
Facebook | Instagram

Ilona and the bears. Longread on utopia

I read a rather interesting article in ElPais about the behaviour of Ilona's friend. I quote the article in full:

"Elon Musk is bear bait.
The millionaire is implementing the same plan in the government that he implemented in X, as if it worked well."

"Grafton is a small town in New Hampshire, in the northeastern United States, with a population of about 1,400. Since 2004, it has been the subject of a political experiment to transform the municipality into an anarcho-capitalist paradise. The initiators hoped that the whole country would understand that taxes are theft, that government intervention leads to poverty, and that it is better to leave everything to private initiative.

Musk has spent several weeks eliminating everything he considers unnecessary, such as aid to poor countries, funding for medical and scientific research, support for military veterans... But without (so far) touching the government contracts of Musk's companies. As the Fortune magazine headline shared on BlueSky by journalist Michael J. Stern summed it up: "Some public officials are enriching themselves at taxpayers' expense, says Elon Musk, whose companies have received at least $20 billion from the government."

The plan is similar to the one he implemented at Twitter: after buying the social network, he laid off 80% of its employees. But there are at least two problems with this: first, the best thing that can be said about X is that it still works (and that's a lot). But even if we ignore the problems of harassment and bias, the operation has not been a success story. According to the fund manager Fidelity, since 2022, X has lost 70% of its value.

It may have paid off for Musk, given where he is now - in the White House, but from a business perspective, the purchase was a disaster. It's as if I fell on the street, broke my nose and found a 200-euro note on the ground. I may have done well, but I can't say that the best way to make money is to break your nose.

The second problem is that Musk behaves as if he is creating a techno-anarcho-capitalist utopia, a drugged-up, chainsaw-wielding Grafton in which the decisions of the leaders are more important than democracy. And this, apart from ethical conflicts and possible illegality, is not a good idea. In his book The Open Society and Its Enemies, Karl Popper reminds us that the danger of utopias is not that their goal is unrealisable (for example, democracy seemed impossible a few centuries ago), but that they propose a complete reconstruction of society. This has "practical implications that are difficult to calculate, given our limited experience".

This is exactly what happened in Grafton. None of the supporters of this libertarian initiative thought that the elimination of public services would attract bears. But social problems - like X problems - are very complex, much more complex than designing a reusable rocket or an electric car. This is not about abandoning big ideas: Popper suggests that we should make progress little by little. This allows us to test the consequences of our decisions and correct them if necessary.

In addition, a company and a country are not the same thing. The public sector should not throw money down the drain, but it can afford to support ideas that we do not yet know whether they will be successful or stupid. Silicon Valley entrepreneurs don't often mention the origins of the Internet, which is in the public domain: it started as a project of the US Department of Defence and a few universities. As technology and design researcher Casey Klimes ironically writes in his book X, if DOGE had existed in 1969, Elon Musk would have killed the initiative: "We're spending a million taxpayer dollars so that professors can text each other?"

So, after reading the article, I decided to find out what Grafton was, what bears had to do with it, and what happened there that one of the central Spanish publications cited this city or town as an example
👇

And I did find it. A whole article. And again I quote it in full, because it's worth it

"This is the story of how a group of dreamers killed a city that had existed for two and a half centuries in a little more than fifteen years. And, of course, it's about bears.

Tracy

Tracy Colburn came home from work that evening tired. She decided that before she collapsed and fell asleep without a care in the world, she needed to feed her dog. So she started to heat up a meat stew. When the dog asked to go outside, she decided to let him out. But when she opened the door, she found three bears on her small porch. Before Tracy could do anything, her dog Kai ran out onto the porch and immediately attacked the largest animal. A fight ensued, and the bear and dog rolled down the stairs. The wild animal tried to paw at Kai, but he deftly dodged and bit him on the backside.

The woman knew that bears are usually afraid of loud shouting, so she screamed with all her might. In a normal situation, this might have helped, but the bear had no alternative: it had a biting dog behind it and Tracy in front of it. The animal lunged at her. Tracy raised her arms to defend herself, and the bear crushed one of her arms with one powerful clawed paw and badly scratched her side. The woman fell towards the door, and it slammed shut behind her, leaving her face to face with the furious predator.

Then everything happened like in slow motion, but finally, the bear ran away into the forest, chased by the dog. Kai returned, tail wagging happily, proud of his feat. Tracy's mood was far from happy. She had lost a lot of blood and definitely could not wait until morning.

One of the distinctive features of the town of Grafton, where these events took place, was that there was no mobile phone service. Therefore, the woman could only crawl to her car and get behind the wheel. She was unable to drive away because the car was equipped with a manual transmission, and her right arm was torn to pieces. The only thing left to do was to press the horn with her left hand, hoping that someone walking or driving by would notice her.

The history of Grafton and New Hampshire's black bear population go hand in hand. When the first colonists came here at the end of the 18th century, the animals were quite enthusiastic about it. They watched with interest as the white monkeys roasted pieces of beef over the fire, and when they were particularly hungry, they did not mind eating both the beef and the white monkeys themselves. Animals did this more than once, and people responded with violence, but neither side won.

The British crown did not care about Grafton and the bears, but it did care about the taxes that the town's residents had to pay to the treasury. That is why the colonists greeted the revolution with enthusiasm, not expecting, of course, that the new government would deprive them of bears, but believing that they would not have to pay taxes.

Their expectations were not met, and the outraged residents of Grafton began to write petitions to the federal authorities, which boiled down to two theses: "we don't want to pay taxes because it is very difficult for us to live" and "we will not pay taxes". And they did not. Moreover, in 1781, the then-independent state of Vermont invited them under its wing, promising not to stutter about taxation. The townspeople gladly voted to secede from New Hampshire.

George Washington, who had heard the news of what was happening, put an end to this issue. He declared that he would "suspend the struggle against the common enemy [the British Empire]" and return all his forces to "raze this state to the ground". Grafton had to back down, but the desire to avoid paying taxes has remained a feature of Graftonians throughout history.

The neighbouring town of Canaan was in almost the same situation as Grafton. It's not that Kanaan is a tax-loving town, but the citizens and local authorities made their choice one way or another.

👇👇

They decided that public infrastructure was a necessary thing and spent money from the city budget to create it. Grafton did the opposite. In the "fat" year of 1881, the city assembly voted to completely abolish the payment of taxes by residents.

However, for some reason, things did not go the way they had envisaged. Until the 1930s, the town had neither firefighters nor a fire station, despite the fact that Grafton residents regularly died in fires. There was also no police station, and law enforcement officers had to conduct interrogations in their homes. And it is worth noting that all of this was not possible precisely because of the will of the people of Grafton, who voted with enviable persistence against any expenditures from the municipal budget. The lack of infrastructure did not attract new residents from outside either.

By 2010, it turned out that the municipal tax in the two settlements did not differ much: the owner of a house worth $150,000 paid $930 a year in Kanaan and $673 in Grafton. Indeed, despite the significantly higher costs of public infrastructure, the population of Kanaan was larger than that of Grafton and had an elementary school, several churches, restaurants, banks, a gift shop, two bakeries, etc.

Utopia and "battles of the homeless"

But in the early 2000s, there were people who liked the Graftonians' approach. These were four new settlers: John Babiarz, Tim Condon, Larry Pendarvis and Bob Gall. All of them were adherents of the libertarian ideology described by Ayn Rand in her novel Atlas Shrugged. They all dreamed of a society in which there were virtually no regulations and taxes, everything was governed by the "invisible hand of the market", and individual motivations were always higher than social ones. This is the kind of society they were going to build in Grafton, which they chose for obvious reasons. This was the beginning of the Free City project.

If everything went as planned, hundreds of like-minded people would rush to the settlement, who, by joining forces through democratic elections, would be able to abolish a bunch of stupid and unnecessary regulations that enslave ordinary people (this is how Pendarvis described the initiative on one of the libertarian forums on the Internet).Among the inalienable rights, the activist listed the possibility of having more than two broken-down cars on his private property, the right to gamble, the right of students to skip school, the right to transport drugs and engage in incest. The libertarian also demanded to allow the transport of human organs, duels and, finally, "battles of the homeless" - when two citizens could give money to homeless people to fight each other. And, of course, cannibalism.

Initially, the locals took the newcomers positively - they shared a common way of thinking: both disliked taxes. However, it soon became clear that the Grafton residents did not like the vigorous activity of the Libertarian Party, and wild statements about cannibalism, duels and fights among the homeless turned them away from the newcomers even more. The founders of the Free City project did not lose heart after receiving a harsh rebuff from the townspeople. They just decided that only their opponents came to the meetings where they tried to push their ideology. But, probably, the majority of people who support their initiative are just sitting at home and waiting for things to get better.

It was decided to stay in Grafton rather than look for a better place for the project. Thus, a pilgrimage of libertarians began to come to the city, inspired by the call that the four founders of the initiative left online. Some of them came with money and families, ready to buy a house and settle down. But for some reason, most of them turned out to be single men with no money in their pockets. They settled on the outskirts of the city, in trailer parks, tents and cabins of their motorhomes.

👇👇👇